|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale
> > and where does the builder put the PTD? and what's the physical memory
> > layout?
>
> For BSD both are irrelevant - the PTD is passed in as an argument via a
> register. Only Linux relies on physical contiguity for the PTOV trick.
> BSD does a table lookup in the mapped page tables - it has no physical
> contiguity requirements.
The domain builder still has to put the PTD somewhere and your
drawing/explanation doesn't say where. Same goes for physical memory
layout, you have to pick one, I'd be interested to know which you picked...
christian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Alex Ho
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Christian Limpach
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Christian Limpach
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Christian Limpach
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Christian Limpach
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale,
Christian Limpach <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, Kip Macy
- [Xen-devel] xen-1.2 again, I RATTAN
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-1.2 again, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-1.2 again, I RATTAN
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen at scale, MAGENHEIMER,DAN (HP-FtCollins,ex1)
|
|
|
|
|