WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Support for privileged operations?

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Support for privileged operations?
From: "Tvrtko A. Uršulin" <tvrtko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:54:34 +0100
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:54:55 +0000
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1At5Tr-0003vK-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Croadria Internet usluge
References: <E1At5Tr-0003vK-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 14:41, Keir Fraser wrote:
> We haven't had time to test many different Xenolinux config
> arrangements. We'll happily accept patches to fix this kind of
> problem!

I will be more than glad to help but unfortunately I cannot do much in the 
following week or two (must deploy several critical production servers). From 
the same reason my Xen testing will calm down a little :)

Also, I can confirm that P4 is a safe CPU config option when building 100% 
monolith XenoLinux while QoS seems to have strange effects. Only thing left 
to be tested is interaction of the afore mentioned when building modular 
kernel. Then I will have definitive answers about problematic/safe options. I 
suspect that mmu update panic is somehow related to modular kernel.

> Note also that you *don't* have to disable 'privileged Xenolinux' to
> be able to safely run domains other than zero. Xen enforces this for
> you -- the privilged parts of a non-zero domain are essentially
> useless.

Sure, I just wanted to optimize the size of the guest image :)


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>