| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-cim
|
BTW - if you want to go 'all the way' in terms of independence, we could ditch wbemcli/CLI/whatever and use straight CIM-XML. I have a small script that uses curl to submit an XML doc to a specific host/port and display the results if/when they get back.
I'm not implying that avoiding a CLI to make our lives simpler is the way to go, but I just wanted to throw it out there as an option [BTW - one that we may be forced to take to test some things like DefineVS(), at least till these CIM clients correctly handle embedded instances...]
- G
xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/11/2007 05:07:27 PM:
> Gareth S Bestor wrote:
> >
> > CIM provider test tool should have little or dependency on a cimom IMO.
> >
>
> Agreed.
>
> Luke,
> Can you put together an equivalent patch that uses sblim-testsuite?
> Sorry for not realizing cimtester dependencies earlier.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
> > SBLIM Testsuite has a 'dependency' on wbemcli, which is a
> > cimom-agnostic command-line client tool for performing CIM operations,
> > pretty much equivalent functionality to Pegasus CLI tool.
> >
> > Perhaps that's enugh reason to go with SBLIM Testsuite? Certainly it
> > lacks ability today to perform complex like scripted CIM
> > operations, but I'm not getting the impression cimtester provides
> > significantly more in terms of functionality. Plus SBLIM Testsuite
> > is being used today for the automated testing of the various SBLIM
> > provider packages going into SLES & RHEL...
> >
> > - Gareth
> >
> > xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/10/2007 02:40:28 PM:
> >
> > > Szymanski, Lukasz K wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch is the humble beginnings of our test suite. The tests did
> > > > not get too far with the latest because of all the instability (CIMOM
> > > > seg faults), however, this is one of the reasons we started down this
> > > > path anyway. There are a bunch of errors if cimtester is run on a
> > > > previous, more stable version, but the test finishes. Let's decide
> > > > soon which direction we want to pursue (sblim-test or cimtester) so I
> > > > can either make improvements on the cimtester stuff or get started on
> > > > the sblim-test work.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Damn... While playing with your patch I realized (while building it)
> > > that cimtester has a dependency on OW client library - which is only
> > > available in the whole of OW itself. So you have to have OW installed
> > > to build/run cimtester :-(.
> > >
> > > sblim-testsuite has a dependency on sblim-wbemcli, but the latter has no
> > > cimom dependencies.
> > >
> > > Seems to me we want a cimom-independent test infrastructure. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-cim mailing list
> > > Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-cim mailing list
> Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim
_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim
|
|
|
| |
|
Home