| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-cim
RE: [Xen-cim] [PATCH]move to changeset 14542
Ewan,
>> I have left two things open.
>> - I was not sure how to integrate with the vbd and vdi code that has
>> come in. These sections of code were commented out with
>VBD<->VDI issue.
>I don't know what this means. Could you explain?
The earlier code just used a field called image to refer to the disk
image. That field has been moved to the vdi_record_opt structure, I
think. I haven't yet written the code to read this structure.
>> - The upstream has not yet accepted the model info for vifs
>patch that
>> Jim sent out.
>
>Jim said that he would go and try a different approach
>(putting the model info in a VIF.other_config dictionary), but
>he hasn't yet come back to me with a new patch.
Cool.
>> This is just the first cut. I was not able to rigorously
>test it since
>> my hvm box is still under the 'old' xen. I am hoping that by sending
>> it out, we will have more people working on it. With this, I can do
>> some basic enumeration etc.
>> The big change between 14542 and the tip seems to be some change in
>> the session handling code.
>
>Calls on the session class now take two session references --
>the first is the session that you're authenticating with, as
>with any call, and the second is the session that you actually
>want to talk about. This will allow us (later) to have the
>ability for superusers to inspect other people's sessions, for example.
>
>As far as you're concerned, just passing in the same session
>handle twice should be all you need to do.
Thanks
Raj
_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim
|
|
|
| |
|
Home