RE: [Xen-cim] Memory pool question

To:	"Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-cim] Memory pool question
From:	"Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:45:45 -0400
Cc:	xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:34:37 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<451BECA3.7070308@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	xen-cim mailing list <xen-cim.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-cim@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcbjFOKyjMf27T6PTyOGNrb6iwnkaQAHhSDQ
Thread-topic:	[Xen-cim] Memory pool question

Jim,
> Are you working on Xen_Memory, Xen_MemoryPool and all of the 
> related associations? I'm about done with it :-/. Pretty much 
> a repeat of the Processor stuff I finished a while back. In 
> fact, many of the associations have common code that needs to 
> be abstracted out. It would have significant impact on lines 
> of code :-).
> 
> In addition I have another version of the memory stuff (and 
> all other providers that touch Xen) for the new C bindings.

Have you checked in your changes into the repository?
When I checked the repo last, it was still in the earlier state.
Have you started working on abstracting out the common code? 

Thanks
Raj

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-cim

RE: [Xen-cim] Memory pool question