|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xci-devel
Re: [Xci-devel] XCI repositories
OK.
I have a few more questions/problems:
1. I'm still trying to build teh XCI for USB, and it's not working for
me at all. Could you please support a downloadable binary or something
like this, which i can just generate the XCI usb from? without the
need to build the whole XCI?
2. All my builds (on a 32 bit Ubuntu) fail, with the following (last) output:
...
nclient_usb/root/lib/libgcc_s*
mkdir -p /root/xci/build/project_build_i686/xenclient_usb/autotools-stamps
touch
/root/xci/build/project_build_i686/xenclient_usb/autotools-stamps/gcc_libs_target_installed
wget --passive-ftp -nd -P /root/xci/build/dl
http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LibAio//libaio-0.3.106-avr32.tar.bz2
--2009-09-22 12:52:57--
http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LibAio//libaio-0.3.106-avr32.tar.bz2
Resolving avr32linux.org... 158.38.152.244
Connecting to avr32linux.org|158.38.152.244|:80...
"
It looks like avr32linux.org:80 isn't alive...
Can u please help me with this?
Tom
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Vincent Hanquez
<vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tom Rotenberg wrote:
>>
>> BTW - does the XCI build system, now supports building on a 64 bit
>> machine?
>>
>
> I'm afraid is still doesn't; it could be possible to build a glibc target on
> buildroot that would probably give less problems than the uclibc target.
>
> I think requiring a 32 bits chroot at the moment is the best option. it
> doesn't support
> less features than building on 64 bits anyway (just a bit more pain for the
> setup), so i think our priority for this is pretty low. until we switch to
> openembedded, which we're looking to do at some point AFAIK.
>
> --
> Vincent Hanquez
>
_______________________________________________
Xci-devel mailing list
Xci-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xci-devel
|
|
|
|
|